Some years ago I lived in a house which had a significant-looking crack in a wall. Of course, I could have papered over it and pretended it wasn’t there. Or filled it with plaster and assumed it was fixed. But the crack would have remained, a weakness in the wall, that may have got worse, even to the point of becoming critical.
Far better to investigate, monitor, and repair wherever possible, because the crack is probably a symptom of stress being applied to one or more parts of it, that is threatening to break it apart under the pressure.
Rather like walls, mission workers are subject to extreme stresses in their lives, and their character can begin to crack under the pressure. So who monitors them, and how, to make sure any issues are dealt with before a serious collapse occurs? Church, friends, agency, family and co-workers can all be part of this by intentionally caring about small incidents which may reveal deeper issues. When somebody loses their temper with a co-worker, speaks harshly to a spouse, or perhaps evidences momentary vulnerability to excessive alcohol consumption, do we love them enough to go beyond forgiving their behaviour to challenge it and ask them what lies beneath?
Spotting these warning signs can be a very important part of stimulating early intervention. But it’s not always easy. Many churches expect their mission partners to be of higher than average character and so accountability can be a problem: nobody asks robust questions because they don’t want difficult answers. Mission partners can be reluctant to appear fallible in a world that doesn’t tolerate failure, so they are happy to pretend everything is fine. Yet one day the cracks may be too big to deal with, and a marriage breaks down, or a ministry falls to pieces. People leave the field in shame.
So what can we do to avoid a collapse?
- We need to develop cultures that encourage accountability, and if mission partners are to feel comfortable to talk about underlying issues in their lives, they need the confidence that they will not be pilloried for failure but supported to reform. Jesus said ‘Let the one who is without guilt cast the first stone’ (John 8:7) but sometimes his followers seem more eager than he was to throw rocks.
- We need to provide accountability structures, encouraging our mission partners to meet with peers and seniors for confidential support and mentoring. We need to make it clear that this can work in partnership with other churches and agencies, rather than trying to keep it ‘in house’. Being accountable to an ‘outsider’ fosters more openness than being accountable to a line manager.
- We need to create a framework for asking robust questions. They don’t need necessarily to be direct accusations such as “Have you accessed pornography on your phone in the last week?” but more subtle ones like “What do you do to make yourself feel good after you’ve had an argument with your spouse?” Questions which set up the opportunity for a confession without presupposing one. I find “How can I pray for your marriage?” is a good one, or “How are things in your soul?”, which a friend of mine uses a lot.
Giving people an opportunity to reflect on their weaknesses, discuss their character flaws and work together on solutions can fix those cracks in the wall before it’s too late. It’s called preventive maintenance. We allow mechanics to do it on our cars, dentists to do it on our teeth, but we don’t let friends do it on our souls, which are far more important. Maybe we should start.